Legal Opinion

United States v. Odeneal

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2008No. 06-5885, 06-5915PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendants Deshaun Odeneal and Shane Andres appeal from their convictions and sentences for participating in a conspiracy to distribute marijuana, heroin, and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and for possessing firearms in furtherance of their drug trafficking crimes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Defendants raised a number of claims on appeal, some of which need not be decided given the determination by Judge Clay, joined by Judge Martin, that the defendants established a Bat-son violation. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Lee Moore v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Timothy SandersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Torres-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. State of Iowa v. Kenneth L. LillySupreme Court of Iowa · 2019

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API