Legal Opinion
Stanley M. Juras v. Aman Collection Service, Inc. And Robert A. Gloss
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 30, 1987No. 84-1923, 84-2356PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
Juras, a judgment debtor, appeals pro se the decisions of the district court that (1) refused to permit amendment of his complaint; (2) dismissed several of his causes for action for failing to state a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; (3) refused to exercise pendent jurisdiction over his state law claims, and (4) granted judgment, after a jury trial, to the defendant Aman on Juras’ remaining claims under the Act. White, appearing as court-appointed counsel for Juras, appeals the district court’s award of $8,540 in attorneys’ fees against Juras for having brought the action…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- James A. Swanson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Southern Oregon Credit Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Kip Rano v. Sipa Press, Inc., Sipa, Inc., Goskin Sipahioglu, SipaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Todd v. Collecto, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Najafi v. Cabrini College (In Re Najafi)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- California State University, Fresno v. Gustafson (In Re Gustafson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.