Legal Opinion
Richard Gordon Bannister v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 7, 1971No. 18073_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
There is no majority opinion in this case. Judges Van Dusen, Adams and Rosenn join in the opinion of Judge Biggs that Bannister’s judgments of conviction must be reversed and the case dismissed. Judge Aldisert joins in Judge Hastie’s opinion that Bannister’s judgments of conviction should be affirmed. Chief Judge Seitz equates his view to Judge Gibbons’ opinion that the indictment is invalid and that the judgments of conviction must be reversed.
The judgment of the court is that the judgments of conviction must be reversed and the case dismissed.
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The defendant-appellant…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. DixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. William Sams Appeal of Victor CarlucciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Dwight W. Tolliver v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. James L. StassiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Herbert F. Smith, Jr. v. Howard Yeager, Warden, New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.