Boring v. Boring
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This was an action by a wife for divorce and alimony. Personal service was had on the defendant. On the sixtieth day from the date of filing the petition, excluding the date of filing, plaintiff took a default judgment for divorce and alimony. As alimony and in settlement of all property rights plaintiff was given the home place in the city of Fort Scott, together with all furniture and personal property in the home.
It appears that shortly after the action was filed defendant had retained Daniel 0. Lardner as his■ attorney, and that Lardner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Connor v. TownsTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Walsh v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- McCurdy v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Garvin v. JennersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Northrop v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Smith v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Baugh v. Rural High School District No. 5Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Gunter v. EiznhamerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.