Legal Opinion

B.P. v. Mayorkas

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 12, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00890Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 B.P. and her minor child L.E.S., CASE NO. C23-0890-KKE 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 DREW H. BOSTOCK, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 This Court’s jurisdiction to consider claims raised by noncitizens in removal proceedings 13 is limited by the Immigration and Nationality Act. See

8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(a)(5), 1252(b)(9). The 14 Court is nonetheless empowered to entertain claims collateral to removal proceedings that do not 15 arise from the removal proceedings themselves. Where, as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Aguilar v. United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of the Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Jonathan O. Madu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API