Legal Opinion
Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. Muscoda Local No. 123, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1943No. 10278PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
In the petition for a rehearing it is stated that the court’s opinion in this case is far-reaching in its effect, extending to all iron-ore, limestone, and coal-mining employees in the United States, and “is of the greatest concern to millions of people and the general public”. In the same petition it is argued that the facts upon which the court’s conclusion was based “applied to only a few of the appellants’ employees and never applied to a great many employees”. Passing over the inconsistency of these statements, it is only necessary to say that if the facts on which…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Edward B. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Heimann v. National Elevator Industry Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Judith S. Feder v. Martin Marietta Corporation and Sperry Rand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- California Ass'n of Employers v. Building and Construction Trades Council of Reno, Nev. And VicinityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.