Legal Opinion

A2D Technologies Inc v. MJ Systems Inc, et

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2008No. 06-20624UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The case before us regards allegations of the unauthorized use of a trademark and similar state law claims brought by two data vendors in the well log industry against two of their competitors. In its ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss, the district court held that a settlement agreement signed by the parties in 1984 barred the current trademark claims and limited the plaintiffs to a breach of contract action. The plaintiffs have appealed this ruling, as well as the district court’s limitation on discovery. For the following reasons, we REVERSE and REMAND for further…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Priester v. Lowndes CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexander Edionwe v. Guy BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Broyles v. TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API