Buchanan v. Kirkpatrick
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentMorgan, Judge
I respectfully dissent because the challenged amendment to the Missouri Constitution (adopted by way of Proposition 5) is violative of and totally inconsistent with the “equal protection” clause of the United States Constitution in that it sets the stage for collecting taxes both from the rich and the poor but refunding excesses thereof only to the rich. Even a casual inquiry as to the constitutionality of such a procedure dictates that the flagrant discriminatory classification thus created cannot stand.
The issue was not considered by the majority opinion presumably because it was not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.