Legal Opinion

People v. Flores

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1976No. Crim. 26900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

Appellant pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity to assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)). In the first phase of a bifurcated trial (Pen. Code, § 1026) he was convicted by a jury on his plea of not guilty. Thereafter in the second phase he was found by a jury to be sane at the time he committed the offense. His appeal is from the judgment and is predicated upon the fact that in spite of timely objection the prosecutor committed prejudicial error in arguing to the jury in the second phase of the trial that the “fatal flaw” in appellant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API