Alvaro Quezada v. A. Herrera
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Alvaro Quezada appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants retaliated and conspired against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Weilburg v. Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir.2007). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Quezada’s retaliation claims because Que-zada failed to allege facts showing that defendants acted with retaliatory intent, and that their actions did not advance a legitimate correctional…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Crowe v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Weilburg v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- (PC) Simmons v. AlcantaraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Burke Robinson v. D. Flores, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Goodrick v. FieldDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
- Goodrick v. FieldDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022