Legal Opinion

Early v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 16, 1989No. 01-86-00448-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals vacated our judgment and remanded this case for reconsideration of appellant’s second point of error in light of its holding in Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529, 552 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (op. on reh’g). In his second point of error, appellant argues that the trial court committed fundamental error by instructing the jury on parole law, pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.P.Ann. art. 37.07, sec. 4(c) 1 . Appellant did not object to the parole charge.

The jury convicted appellant of attempted murder with a firearm, and assessed punishment at six years…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Kizzee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. Kizzee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API