Legal Opinion

Curtis Koehler v. Officer Riddle, et al.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 2026No. 3:23-cv-00939Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CURTIS KOEHLER, : NO. 3:23-CV-00939 Plaintiff, : : v. : : (CAMONI, M.J.) OFFICER RIDDLE, et al., : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Sexual abuse in prison is a serious matter. Naturally, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recognized that sexual abuse in prison can violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments. Ricks v. Shover,

891 F.3d 468, 473

(3d Cir. 2018). But not every sexual assault claim does. The sexual assault at issue must be objectively harmful or sufficiently serious to violate…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API