Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Asbury
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 19, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5543PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Judge.
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company appeals from a declaratory judgment in favor of Stanley Asbury, D.O., Susan Slater and David Slater, wife and husband, Gloria Lund, Chris Wolcott, and Marie Josefowicz and Robert Josefowicz, wife and husband, providing Dr. Asbury with professional liability insurance coverage for conduct committed while performing gynecological examinations of Slater, Lund, Wolcott and Josefowicz. St. Paul claims Asbury’s conduct, intentional and improper manipulation during gynecological examinations, was unprofessional and therefore not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bank of California, N. A. v. W. H. Opie, California Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Woo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Bodin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Roe v. Federal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.