Legal Opinion

Bodin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2006No. 05-50707PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs Kent Bodin and Gordon Meyers appeal judgments on partial findings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(c) in favor of the defendant United States on their claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq.

I

Bodin and Meyers were psychiatric patients of Dr. Gregory Vagshenian at an outpatient facility in Austin operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”). The plaintiffs alleged and presented evidence that during regularly scheduled visits, Dr. Vagshenian performed illegal,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Ackerson v. Bean Dredging, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Wagstaff v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. Lewis v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Chang-Williams v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  5. Villafranca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API