Sunderland v. Whitcomb
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
— Because we determine that a revocable living trust was not effectively revoked by the trustor when he executed a later last will and testament, we reverse and remand.
I
Robert J. Furst created and funded a living trust, the Robert J. Furst Revocable Trust. He transferred all of his assets into the trust, except for his personal effects, including a valuable diamond ring and $13,000 in United States savings bonds. He did so through the services of an attorney, who discussed the process with him in detail. The attorney testified that Mr. Furst clearly understood that his assets needed to be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burg v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Allen v. DillardWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Poltz v. TyreeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manary v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Estate of BurksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In re the Estate of BurksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Dahle v. NadolskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- In Re Estate of CorderoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.