Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coleman v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1929No. 10219Published

1DissentLooney, J.

Under my view

of the law, hereinafter stated, appellant was not entitled to recover in any event; but if in this I am mistaken, I agree that the case was properly reversed and remanded, because the evidence shows a much larger sum of money was due appellant than the jury found in his favor. However, I cannot agree that the case should have been reversed on either of the other two grounds mentioned by the majority, and, while not essential to the disposition of the case, I deem it not out of place to briefly express my views on these grounds.

The majority, for reasons stated, held that the trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McNeillTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Beer v. LandmanTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Reed v. BrewerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API