Legal Opinion

Earle v. Conway

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1900No. 219PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE PENNSYLVANIA The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This case differs somewhat in its facts, from those in Earle v. Pennsylvania, ante, 449. It appears that on February 24, 1898, the appellee Conway, in an action of assumpsit in the Court of Common Pleas of the.county of Philadelphia, ob tained a judgment against one John G. Sehall for $1012.43. Upon that judgment á writ of attachment was issued and served May 24 and 25,189S, upon the Chestnut Street National Bank of Philadelphia and upon Earle, receiver, as garnishees— the receiver having been appointed January 29, 1898 — commanding’ them to show cause on a day named why the judgment against…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steele v. RandallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Corbitt v. Farmers' Bank of DelawareU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1902
  3. Robinson v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1930
  4. Consolidated Rendering Co. v. McManusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
  5. Sargent County v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API