Legal Opinion
Robinson v. First Nat. Bank
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided December 8, 1930No. 19PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
The property for which suit is brought consists of money on deposit and promissory notes. This property was turned over to the bank by Taylor, acting as án executor under a will probated in Kentucky. Certain lands of the Kentucky decedent being situated in Texas, executor Taylor qualified under the probate laws of Texas and proceeded to collect the Texas property. Later he was removed by the Kentucky court, and the plaintiff in this suit named in his stead. The present plaintiff has not sought nor been clothed with any Texas probate authority. Prior to the institution…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McWilliams v. DawsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1943
- Holyfield v. Guaranty Title & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1938
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977