Legal Opinion

Amick v. Exchange State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1925No. 24,759PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Action for conversion. Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The record presents the question as to whether or not while chapter 510, L. 1919, was in force (repealed by chapter 472, L. 1921), title to an automobile could be transferred other than as therein provided. .Section 7 thereof reads as follows:

“All sales, assignments or attempted sales or transfers of motor vehicles in this state, title to which has not been registered or assigned, as herein provided for, shall be voidable and shall be a violation of this act.”

1. In the absence of this statute there could…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bolton-Swanby Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Rice Street Motors v. SMITHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Chard v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. King-Godfrey, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Rigney v. SwingleyMontana Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API