Rice Street Motors v. SMITH
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
The problem confronting the Court in this replevin action concerns the rights of two innocent parties. Rice Street Motors, now for the use of the Commerciai Credit Company, appellant, at St. Paul, Minnesota, on April 11,1946, sold a 1940 Plymouth coupe under a conditional sales agreement to LeRoy A. Smith, alias Roy Smith, and then assigned the contract to the appellant. Smith applied for and was issued a registration card from the State of Minnesota for the year ending December 81, 1946. On the registration card was printed “This is also Minnesota title.” (Italics…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Turnbull v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Majors v. MajorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- First Nat. Bk. of Jamestown v. SheldonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Willys-Overland Co. of California v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hertz Corp. v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- CASTERLINE v. GMACSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Summers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Speck Cadillac-Olds, Inc. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Casterline v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.