Legal Opinion

Ponstein v. Van Dyk

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1937No. Docket No. 122, Calendar No. 39,692PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

On July 3, 1922, defendants borrowed $3,500 from plaintiffs on a promissory note secured by real estate mortgage. On January 14, 1933, defendants were in default in payments of interest and taxes. Evidently to avoid the expense and trouble of foreclosure, defendants gave plaintiffs a quitclaim deed to the mortgaged premises; at the same time, plaintiffs agreed in a written contract that defendants might occupy the premises for one year until March 1, 1934; that if defendants were able to pay all of the unpaid taxes and accrued interest then due plaintiffs prior to March 1, 1934, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. First Nat. Bank of Utica v. RammMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Beal v. AlschulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Mabie v. HatingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sylvania Savings Bank v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Shedd v. KrushinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. United States v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API