Legal Opinion

Shedd v. Krushinski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 41,529PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

The individual plaintiffs and the Grand River Boulevard Improvement Association, a Michigan nonprofit corporation, filed their bill of complaint against the defendants, husband and wife, to prevent them from violating an alleged restriction against the use and occupancy by other than the Caucasian race of a certain building which defendant Alex Krushinski is purchasing on a land contract. The restricted area is on West Grand boulevard between Tireman and McGraw avenues in the city of Detroit and the building involved is situate on the south 45 feet of lot 12, block 3 of Scovel’s subdivision…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Anderson v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cook v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Dolese v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. First Nat. Bank of Utica v. RammMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sylvania Savings Bank v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API