Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided November 6, 1996No. Civil Action 91-K-591PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, Senior District Judge.

This securities fraud action was dismissed without prejudice after the Supreme Court issued its decision in Lampf, Pieva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, 501 U.S. 350, 111 S.Ct. 2773, 115 L.Ed.2d 321, reh’g denied, 501 U.S. 1277, 112 S.Ct. 27, 115 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1991). Lampf established a three-year statute of limitations for such actions and Plaintiff conceded his claims were time-barred under that case. When Congress passed a law providing a 60-day period for reinstating claims dismissed as time-barred under Lampf, Plaintiff…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Richard L. Sandstrom, Etc. v. Chemlawn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joseph v. WilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API