Legal Opinion

Beiser v. Supervisor's District No. 2

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1917Published

Appeal from the circuit court of Smith county. Hon. W. H. Hughes, Judge. Suit by George William Beiser against Supervisors District No. 2, Smith County. From a judgment, plaintiff appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the circuit court of Smith county. Hon. W. H. Hughes, Judge. Suit by George William Beiser against Supervisors District No. 2, Smith County. From a judgment, plaintiff appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. It was the contention of the appellant in the court below and is his contention now that he was a purchaser of the interest coupons sued on, for value, in good faith and before maturity, without any knowledge or information remote or otherwise of any agreement made by appellee with J. R. Sutherlin & Company, the original purchaser of the coupons, and…

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The appellant was the plaintiff in the court below, and bled suit against the board of supervisors and road commissioners of district No. 2 for interest on a twenty-five thousand dollar bond issue of road district No. 2 for a period from July 1, 1914, to January 1, 1915, amounting to seven hundred and fifty dollars. . It, appears that the board of supervisors of Smith county for district No. 2 of Smith county, on the 1st of July, 1914, sold an issue of twenty-five thousand dollars of its road bonds for said *848district bearing six per cent, interest, payable.semi-annually on tbe 1st days of July…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Vicksburg v. LombardMississippi Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Cutler v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Board of Supervisors v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of Aberdeen v. SykesMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API