Legal Opinion

Bank v. Brier

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM FICNTRESS. Appeal from Chancery Court of Fentress County. B. M. Webb, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

These are attachment bills (except that of Murray, Dibrell & Co., which is a cross bill), consolidated and heard together. The original bills attach a stock of merchandise and certain real estate, and attack two conveyances of the same made by Brier, on the ground that one purports to be a general assignment under the Act of 1881, Chapter 121, but is invalid and void because it does not comply with the requirements of that Act, and the other on the ground that it is fraudulent and void in law and fact.

The Chancellor, in the Court below, held both' deeds valid, and refused to grant…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phifer v. Gulf Oil CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Williams v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Greene County Union BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Greene County Union BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API