Legal Opinion

Olson v. Myrland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1935No. 30,512PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant B. O. Myrland are brothers, and defendant Beuben is the latter’s son. The difference in names comes about by reason of the fact that plaintiff did not adopt the farm name Myrland after coming to this country from Norway. Only the first named defendant was served Avith summons, defendant Beuben being a resident of Iowa and as such not subject to the jurisdiction of our courts. Hereafter Ave shall refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover upon three promissory notes executed by both defendants and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  2. Ward v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Newberg v. ConleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Russell & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Loudy v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. OsvenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Berghuis v. BurgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Butler v. Builders Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Goin v. PremoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API