Legal Opinion
The Amelia
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided December 22, 1910No. 1,271PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Admiralty. Libel by Andrew Nodop against the tug Amelia for seaman’s wages.
1Opinion of the Court
TOULMIN, District Judge.
The libelant was a seaman on the tug Amelia, running in the Mobile river and hay and Mississippi sound, in the state of Mississippi, being thus engaged in the coastwise trade. He claims the sum of 853.32 is due him for wages Cor services rendered in September, 3910. The respondent does not deny the claim *900for wages, but the owner and claimant of the tug refused to pay the •claim, and sets up that libelant’s wages had been attached by garnishment process served upon him for $46.55. The process had been issued in accordance with the usual course of procedure in the courts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Patterson v. Bark EudoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Wilder v. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ross v. BourneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1883
- In re KetchumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waterman S. S. Corporation v. BrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Schnack v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
- Michigan Furniture Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1936
- In re SutherlandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1912
- Ornstein v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917