Legal Opinion

Strong v. Hollon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Hillsdale. Garnishment. Garnishee defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

1. The first error assigned on this record is that the court refused to require the plaintiffs to fur-, nish a bill of particulars of what they expected to establish against the garnishee. As the .garnishee had already been called upon to make disclosure, and had made it, *412and as the dealings between him and the principal debtor must be supposed to be peculiarly within his knowledge, we do not think any such bill of particulars was a matter of right. It might be proper in some cases, but in this case nothing appears to show its importance.

2. It is objected that the court permitted the judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zimmer v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barber v. HowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Sweeney v. SchlessingerMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Jackson v. Leelanaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Winne v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API