Legal Opinion

Huber v. Miller

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1960No. 7828, 7829PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge (On reassignment).

The first-entitled action, hereinafter referred to as the “injunction action,” is an action for an injunction brought by the plaintiffs as resident taxpayers of -Oliver County against the defendants as county commissioners of Oliver County, against the county auditor and the county treasurer, and against Oliver County, a public corporation, to restrain the county commissioners from disbursing funds derived from a levy made by the county commissioners under a farm-to-market and Federal-aid program provided for in Section 57-15063 of the 1953 Supplement to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Roosma v. MootsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bismarck Water Supply Co. v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wood v. BangsSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1875
  5. Holmes v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hagerott v. Morton County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Hjelle v. BakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bernhardt v. RummelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Washburn Public School District No. 4 v. State Board of Public School EducationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API