Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robin v. Sydeman Bros.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 24, 1932Published

1DissentEpes, J.

The court, in its opinion says: “When the defendant obtained knowledge of the fact that the plaintiff was not meeting the requirements of the contract it had the right to. elect (1) to stand upon the strict terms of the contract and insist that the.plaintiff produce a volume of business that would in a year amount to $100,000.00 and to insist that the collections and losses would be as good as the average of the chain, and if the plaintiff could not meet these requirements (and the evidence conclusively shows that he could not), the defendant had the right to treat such failure as a breach,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jerome v. . Queen City Cycle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Gray v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Hill Cattle Corporation v. KillornMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ginsberg v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Macauley v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API