Legal Opinion

Lawson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1986No. 84-1434PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

Pernell Lawson was convicted of armed robbery, and assault with intent to commit robbery while armed. He challenges that portion of the government’s closing argument wherein the prosecutor, without obtaining the trial court’s permission, referred to Pernell’s failure to call certain persons as witnesses and urged the jury to draw an adverse inference from such failure. We hold that the prosecutorial remarks'were improper and, in the circumstances of this case, deprived appellant of a fair trial. We reverse his convictions.

I

The indictment charged that Lawson committed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Cleveland Burgess v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. MacAnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Lemon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Morris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API