Morris v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant Maurice W. Morris appeals his convictions 1 by a jury on the grounds that (1) the trial judge erred in allowing an improper missing witness argument and improper comment on appellant’s post-arrest silence during cross-examination and closing argument, (2) the trial judge erred in refusing to admit evidence of other crimes committed by a third person, and (3) appellant’s conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon merged with the conviction for attempted robbery while armed. We hold that the government did not make a missing witness argument, and we find no…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- United States v. McLaughlin, RicoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Frye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.