Legal Opinion

Morris v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1993No. 91-CF-1150PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant Maurice W. Morris appeals his convictions 1 by a jury on the grounds that (1) the trial judge erred in allowing an improper missing witness argument and improper comment on appellant’s post-arrest silence during cross-examination and closing argument, (2) the trial judge erred in refusing to admit evidence of other crimes committed by a third person, and (3) appellant’s conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon merged with the conviction for attempted robbery while armed. We hold that the government did not make a missing witness argument, and we find no…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. United States v. McLaughlin, RicoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Frye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API