Legal Opinion

Polaroid Corp. v. Offerman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1998No. COA97-476PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiff Polaroid Corporation (“Polaroid”), domiciled in Massachusetts, filed this action seeking a partial tax refund pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-267 (1989) of income tax paid to the State of North Carolina for the 1991 tax year. Polaroid requests a refund of additional assessed taxes and interest totaling $499,177.00 based on a $924,526,554.00 recovery from a patent infringement suit Polaroid instigated in 1976 against Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”). See Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., U.S.P.Q.2d 1711 (1991).

For North Carolina corporate income tax purposes,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Appeal of Clayton-Marcus Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Whitley v. CubberlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Miller v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Union Carbide Corp. v. OffermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Union Carbide Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API