Legal Opinion

Chelsea Exchange Bank v. LaHiff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 18, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

The action was brought against the defendant? appellant, as the indorser of a promissory note made by one Benjamin B. Green, payable to the order of Nikola Chemical Co., Inc., at the plaintiff bank. Before delivery of the note the defendant LaHiff indorsed the same, and it is alleged in the complaint that the note was thereafter duly delivered by said Green to the payee for value, and that the said payee thereafter and before maturity of the note duly indorsed and delivered the note to the plaintiff for a valuable consideration. The complaint alleges that at the maturity of said note the same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . RidgwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Williams v. . First National Bank of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Williams v. First National Bank of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Chelsea Exchange Bank v. LaHiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County Trust Co. v. MaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API