Legal Opinion

Williams v. . First National Bank of Syracuse

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 6, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an ordór denying a motion for a new trial.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff sought to recover $2,000, the amount of his deposit in the defendant’s bank. The defense was that the defendant had applied the deposit in payment of the plaintiff’s past due note made by the plaintiff and others severally for the same amount. The question of fact was whether the plaintiff signed the note at the request of the bank made through its cashier for the accommodation of a railroad company, out of whose bonds in the custody of the bank it promised to pay the note.

The trial court submitted the case to the jury in a charge to which the defendant took no exception. The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chelsea Exchange Bank v. LaHiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. County Trust Co. v. MaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. First Trust & Deposit Co. v. LeMessurierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API