Legal Opinion

Huff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1913No. A-1750PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from County Court, Love Countyj B. A. Keller, Judge. Sam Huff was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals. E. M. Eskew testified for the state that he was at the depot when defendant Huff got off the train about 11:30 p. m. about 60 feet south of the depot. He had a package under his arm and started on up, passed the depot, with Green White and Sam Huff, when they were stopped and the whisky was taken from them. Said they had the whisky for club.

Read the full summary

Appeal from County Court, Love Countyj B. A. Keller, Judge. Sam Huff was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals. E. M. Eskew testified for the state that he was at the depot when defendant Huff got off the train about 11:30 p. m. about 60 feet south of the depot. He had a package under his arm and started on up, passed the depot, with Green White and Sam Huff, when they were stopped and the whisky was taken from them. Said they had the whisky for club. A good many people were present. This occurred at the depot. In the conversation that took place, defendant said that he and…

1Opinion of the CourtFukman, J.

(after stating the facts as above). First. Appellant, who lives in Love county, Okla., which was formerly a part of the Indian Territory, was convicted for having conveyed whisky from one point in said state and county to another point in said state and county. The defense was that the whisky being conveyed rvas brought by him from Gaines-ville, Tex., on the railroad train and that it belonged to a club of eight, each of whom contributed a proportionate amount to pay for it, and that appellant was conveying the whisky from the depot to his home for distribution among the owners.

Counsel for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tyler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API