Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Harrison

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the trial court properly upheld the distribution of trust income to the testator’s grandchildren on a per capita basis or whether the testator intended per stirpes distribution based upon the language the testator chose to employ in a lawyer-drawn will. Because we hold that the testator intended per stirpes distribution, we reverse the trial court’s decree and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The pertinent facts and procedural history underlying this appeal may be summarized as follows. Harry W. Harrison, Sr.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Wanamaker EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Mayhew's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Rosengarten EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Hogg's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Walton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SchultheisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Estate of: McFadden, G. Appeal of: Harrison, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In Re Estate of RiderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. In Re Estate of ElkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. In re Estate of PelesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API