Legal Opinion

Jones v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DEL SOLE, P.J.E.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting Appellee Harleysville Mutual In surance Company’s (Harleysville) motion for summary judgment. Appellants brought this action against their insurer, Harleysville, as a result of its denial of benefits under a policy which covered property loss due to fire. The trial court concluded that Appellants’ breach of contract claim was barred by the policy’s two-year contractual limitations period and that Harleysville’s denial of coverage under the policy was reasonable thereby precluding recovery on Appellants’ bad faith claim.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adamski v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. General State Authority v. Planet InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Diamon v. Penn Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Ash v. Continental Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Rancosky v. Washington National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Fieldhouse, D. v. Metropolitan PropertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Kelly, C. v. H.C. Kerstetter Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Mountainside Holdings v. American Dynasty SurplusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API