State v. Carter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.
¶ 239. (dissenting). I dissent from the majority opinion, which awards the defendant 305 days of sentence credit on a Wisconsin sentence for time spent in Illinois custody on an Illinois criminal charge. I fear that the majority opinion confuses sentence credit and misplaces the burden of proof that properly lies with the defendant. In addition, the majority asserts that its sentence credit analysis applies only with respect to concurrent sentences, see majority op., ¶ 6 ("hop[ing] [the majority] ha[s] provided greater clarity in awarding sentence credit in a case involving concurrent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. BeiersdorfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. DemarsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.