Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Pennsylvania Railroad Employees Provident & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1937No. Appeal, No. 402PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

John Daisley, decedent, an employee of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, became a member of its Employees Provident and Loan Association. The purposes of this organization were the encouragement of thrift *542among its members by systematic savings and to provide a means whereby the members could borrow money to purchase pensions or stock in the Company. Decedent’s application for membership provided: “. . .in the event of my death, unless I shall otherwise designate in writing, I name as my beneficiary, to receive such sums as may then stand to my credit, my…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  2. Dickerson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Lines v. Lines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1891
  4. Estate of GaffneyPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Cambria County · 1892
  5. Reiff's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ebersole v. Pa. R.R. Emp. P. L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Ebersole v. Pennsylvania Railroad Employes' Provident & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Klinger v. Philadelphia Local Union No. 2, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1947
  4. Luckenbaugh's EstateYork County Orphans' Court · 1947
  5. McAnany v. City of Philadelphia Police Pension Fund Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API