Legal Opinion

Hofsvang v. Estate of Brooke

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 15, 1995No. 34363-7-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

The Estate of Robert E. Brooke (Estate) appeals the trial court’s ruling that RCW 5.60.030, the statute prohibiting testimony regarding transactions with decedents (the statute), does not apply when the estate is covered by liability insurance. We hold that Washington law does not provide for an "insurance exception” to the statute. Because we conclude that the Hofsvangs cannot make a prima facie case without the prohibited testimony, we reverse and remand with instructions to grant summary judgment for the Estate.

Facts

Attorney Robert Brooke performed legal services for the Hofsvangs. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Erickson v. KERR, MDPS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hutcheson v. Estate of Se'ChristCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Wildman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Jenkins v. NachandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parks v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Dahle v. NadolskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. In Re Estate of CorderoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Hofsvang v. Estate of BrookeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API