Legal Opinion
Silver & Goldstein v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 14, 1927No. 5444PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
When this case was here before, this court held that it could not be held as a matter of law that the assignments by the bankrupts to Ridley-Yates Company, under the facts appearing in the record then before the court, were fraudulent per se, but that “The question as to whether or not the sale and assignment of the exemptions claimed was bona fide, or fraudulent was for the jury under the facts of the case.” Silver & Goldstein v. Chapman, 161 Ga. 203 (129 S. E. 842). Upon the trial of the case now under consideration the jury found the sale and assignment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Calloway v. People's BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Strickland Hardware Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Eastman v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
- Atlas Tack Co. v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Johnson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moncrief Furnace Co. v. Northwest Atlanta BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Suttles v. VickerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Seagraves v. Couch & JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Johnson v. SherrerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.