Legal Opinion
Greenwood v. Greenwood
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 24, 1934No. Nos. 9806, 9807PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHutcheson, J.
A motion was made to dismiss the writ of error, for the reason that E. L. Jones, a necessary party, was not served with the bill of exceptions. He was subsequently made a party, and acknowledged service of the bill of exceptions. Thé motion to dismiss is overruled. Civil Code (1910), § 6160, par. 3.
*610W. H. Greenwood became indebted to T. B. Higdon for services rendered as attorney at law in certain litigation, and to secure this indebtedness W. H. Greenwood assigned his interest in the estate of his father on September 17, 1931, and this assignment was served on Ellis, administrator, on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Turk v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Lester v. TooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Sterling v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Nelson v. MurfeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Sanders v. HeppSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Walker v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Kilgore v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Nesmith v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.