Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 1969No. 41893PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

We are presented with certification of a question which the trial court considered doubtful or important (Minn. St. 632.10), arising out of a postconviction proceeding (§§ 590.01 to 590.06), instituted by petition of T. Eugene Thompson, who is now serving a sentence for the offense of first-degree murder. State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1, 139 N. W. (2d) 490.

In the proceeding, Donald John Giese, a newspaper reporter, was called as a witness, presumably to give testimony relating to Thompson’s claim that he was “denied his Constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial because…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Lowden v. Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. LariveeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Jablonski v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. State v. WicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API