King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
WOODLEY, Judge.
Appellant complains of the disposition •made of his informal bills of exception relating to the testimony of Inspectors Whit-tenberg and Cosper.
A re-examination of the record reveals that the only objection that was made and overruled in regard to Inspector Whitten-berg’s testimony as to what occurred on March 21 was to the question: “To whom was the identification made?” This question had been answered: “It was made to Mr. Vonner” before any objection was made and there was no motion to withdraw the question or the answer.
Inspector Cosper…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Christesson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Meza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965