Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Van Buren Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1922No. Calendar No. 30,433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff was arrested in St. Joseph county under a writ of capias ad respondendum issued *505out of the circuit court of Van Burén county. He moved for his discharge for the reason, among others, that the sheriff of Van Burén county had no authority to make the arrest in another county. We aré asked to require the defendant to set aside the order denying this motion and to grant the same.

Our statutory provisions relative to the issue, service and return of such writs will be found in 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12414 et seq. No express provision will be found authorizing service outside the county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennock v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Turrill v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  3. In re BaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  4. Ahlrep v. HughesWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Baker v. CaseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Genack v. GormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Salmanovitz v. Dexter-Davison Markets, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Higgins v. Hampshire Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Swanson v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API