Legal Opinion

La Cagnina v. City of Schenectady

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Dominick J. Viscardi, J.

Plaintiffs herein, who are taxpayers of the City of Schenectady, move by way of order to show cause for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from conducting a special election scheduled to be held on June 5, 1979.

Pursuant to section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, Local Laws, 1978, Local Law No. 4 of the City of Schenectady, which provided for a change in the City of Schenectady’s form of government from a limited council with an appointed City Manager (hereinafter referred to as "weak Mayor”) to a government by limited council with an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Morin v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. In re GrenfellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Matter of Grenfell (Lawyer)New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. In re GrenfellNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Castine v. ZurloNew York Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API