Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Grenfell (Lawyer)

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the Appellate Division that if the provisions of the Second Class Cities Law were to be adopted as a city charter, such provisions were required by the statute to be designated specifically in the proposed local law. We pass upon no other question.

The order should be affirmed.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Medalie, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Visser v. MagnarelliDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
  2. In re YarasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Noonan v. O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. Curcio v. BoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. La Cagnina v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API