Reynolds v. Transport Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentPope, Judge
The dispute here centers upon the interpretation to be given a certain provision of the Georgia Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act, OCGA § 33-34-1 et seq. The provision in question is OCGA § 33-34-2 (8) which defines “occupying” as “to be in or upon a motor vehicle or engaged in the immediate act of entering into or alighting from the motor vehicle.”
As is pertinent here, no-fault benefits are recoverable for accidental bodily injury sustained by a person other than the named insured, such as appellant here, “while occupying the owner’s motor vehicle if the accident occurs within the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clinton v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Leverette v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Ferguson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Kelley v. Integon Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Jones v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.