Legal Opinion
Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1987No. C4-87-929, C8-87-965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.
Relator George A. Hormel and respondents, approximately 600 claimants for un*708employment compensation, seek review of a decision by the Commissioner of Jobs and Training that respondents filed valid claims for benefits immediately after a strike began at Hormel’s Austin, Minnesota plant on August 17, 1985; that the strike ceased active progress on May 23, 1986, when the trustee for respondents’ local union sent Hormel an unconditional offer to return to work on behalf of all striking employees; that employees who made individual offers to return to work before the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Kitchen v. G. R. Herberger's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Kalin v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. AsperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hackenmiller v. Ye Olde Butcher ShoppeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. AsperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987